Vexing the World
All of Jonathan Swift's published writings
were satirical, and a rather large majority based on the governmental and
economic plight of his home country, Ireland. The era and country in which
he lived were the driving force behind all of Swift's writings, although
it sometimes seems that any era or country would have done. Satire is rarely
as directly applicable in any context other than that in which it was written,
so the context itself is the important factor in how the writings actually
turn out. As he wrote in one of his last works, Verses on the Death of
Dr. Swift, a poem which was actually intended to predict what others
would say about him after he died, "[Swift] had too much satire in his vein;
/ and seem'd determin'd not to starve it, / because no age could more deserve
it (Starkman 522)." Had he lived in a different age, Swift would probably
still have found something to write about, although the writings produced
would bear no resemblance to his current stack of prose and poetry.
Swift's name actually appeared on very few
of his works, which he typically published under pseudonyms (Fox, 7). Had
he used his real name, he would have been arrested several times, as at least
two of his "angry state-of-Ireland" pamphlets were declared illegal and
seditious. The Drapier's Letters, written on the state of Ireland's
declining economy, inspired the Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, Lord Carteret
(who, incidentally, later became a close friend of Swift's) to offer a reward
to anyone who would reveal the identity of their author and to arrest both
John Harding, the publisher of the letters, and his wife. (Glendinning,
169)
During his lifetime, which lasted just a
month short of 75 years, Swift managed to offend just about everybody who
was anybody in the whole of the British isles. An admitted misanthrope where
the general public was concerned, Swift wrote in a letter to Alexander Pope
that "I have ever hated all nations, professions, and communities, and all
my love is toward individuals... principally I hate and detest that animal
called man... (Bloom, 29)." He had previously stated his entire purpose in
having written his most famous work, Gulliver's Travels, had been
to "vex the world rather than divert it." His purpose was in many circles
extremely well accomplished.
The last part of Gulliver's Travels,
"A Voyage to the Land of the Houyhnhnms," probably made the biggest splash
of anything Swift wrote with its extremely unflattering portrait of humanity
as seen in the grotesque Yahoos. The intent of that portion of the book had
likely been to show human nature both at its best, in the virtuous horse-like
Houynhnhnms, and at its worst, in the vaguely human-shaped yet entirely repulsive
Yahoos. Swift entirely disagreed with the definition of man as a rational
animal and instead claimed humans should rather be classified as animals
potentially capable of reason. Shortly after the book's publication, an associate
of Swift's, John Gay, wrote in a letter to him that it had been the conversation
of the whole town. Reactions, as he went on to tell, ranged from "blaming
it as a design of evil consequence to depreciate human nature" and being
"in raptures at it." Unfortunately for Swift, as it undermined his whole
scheme, Gay also wrote that the vast majority "agree in liking it extremely."
Of course, after his death, those readers of the book in the 19th century
were united in their self-righteous outrage and rejection of the book; Witness
Thackeray spoke for nearly all of them when he called Swift "a monster gibbering
shrieks and gnashing imprecations against mankind-tearing down all shreds
of modesty...filthy in word, filthy in thought, furious, raging, obscene."
Swift could hardly have asked for a higher acclamation.
|